Lawyer suspended for posting video of undercover drug buy in mistaken belief it exonerated client-ABA Journal

***
Gilsdorf “published damning evidence on the Internet with little to no thought or discussion of the possible consequences to his client,” the Review Board said. “His conduct threatened the fairness of a criminal proceeding and harmed his client.”
 
***
 

Prior coverage:

ABAJournal.com: “Should lawyer who posted video implicating client be disciplined?”

ABAJournal.com: “Ethics Complaint Claims Lawyer Tried to Sway Potential Jurors by Posting Discovery Video on YouTube”

Advertisements

Should judges disclose Facebook friends? ‘Context is significant,’ ABA ethics opinion says – ABA Journal

Judges who participate in social networking sites must heed the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct, cautions Formal Opinion 462 (PDF). That means the judges should avoid contacts that would undermine their independence, integrity, or impartiality, or that would create an appearance of impropriety.

The Feb. 21 opinion by the ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility acknowledges that “judicious use” of electronic social media–referred to as “ESM”–can be a valuable tool for public outreach. “When used with proper care, judges’ use of ESM does not necessarily compromise their duties under the Model Code any more than use of traditional and less public forms of social connection such as U.S. Mail, telephone, email or texting,” according to the opinion

Related articles

%d bloggers like this: